New Improvements in TFT Models: Amorphous (Level=35) and Poly-Silicon (Level=36) TFT
Introduction
New improvements have been added to Shur models. These enhancements include self-heating effect and a new charge conservation model.
Self-Heating
The self-heating effect is a major feature for TFT which exhibit low thermal conductivity ([1],[2]). The self-heating is activated with SHMOD selector (model parameter). If this parameter is set to 1 and the thermal resistance is different from 0, an internal single thermal node and a thermal circuit are created. The thermal circuit includes a thermal resistance and a thermal capacitance in parallel.
Modified Device Declaration
Syntax
Mxxx nd ng ns mname <M> <OFF> <IC=vds, vgs>
+ <TEMP>=val or DTEMP=val> <L=val> <W=val> <NRS=val>
+ <NRD=val> <AD=val> <AS=val> <PD=val> <PS=val>
+ <GEO=val> <RTH=val> <CTH=val> <NOSELFT=val>
New instance parameters:
RTH: Thermal resistance (deg. C / W). The default value is the model parameter RTH0.
CTH: Thermal capacitance (W.s/ deg. C). The default value is the model parameter CTH0.
NOSELFT: Selector to de-activated self-heating at device level. It overrides SHMOD model parameter. The default value is 0.
New Model Parameters
| Parameter | Description | Units | Default |
| SHMOD (SELFT) | Self-heating selector | - | 0 |
| RTH0 | Thermal resistance | oC/W | 0.0 |
| CTH0 | Thermal capacitance | W.s/ oC | 0.0 |
New Output Device Variables
| Parameter | Description | Units |
| TEMPNODE | Number of temperature node | - |
| TDEV | Device temperature when self-heating is turned on | deg. C |
| DELT | Device temperature differencewhen self-heating is turned on | deg. C |
Characteristics
Curves Id-Vd exhibit different behavior according to parameters related to temperature. Whereas the curves show more saturation with DVTO model parameter (>0) than the curves without self-heating , the curves with DMU1 (<0) give less current and can lead to gds < 0 (Figure 1). This can be explained by the following equations:
Vteff = VTO - DVTO . (temp - TNOM)
And
Tmu1 = MU1 + DMU1 . (temp - TNOM)
Since the model parameter DVTO (>0) decreases the threshold voltage, the ids current increases. On the contrary, DMU1 (<0) decreases ids current since Tmu1 (FET mobility) decreases.

Figure 1 : Self-heating effect with level=36
New Charge Conserving Model
In Shur capacitance model, the charges qgs and qgd are numerically calculated from the capacitance capgs and capgd. This leads to problems of charge non-conservation. The charge based approach announced in [3] is presented here. This charge conservating model is selected with CAPMOD=-2 and is based on Lerouxs charge model (level=15). This new model also allows speed up (factor 2.5) and simple extraction (only one parameter).
New Model Parameter
| Parameter | Description | Units |
Default |
| TC | Characteristic temperature | K |
390 |
Description of the Charge
Model
This charge model is the same as in level 15 (Lerouxs model).
Please refer to SmartSpice/UTMOST manual
for more information (equations, parameters,...) about this model
charge.
New Output Device Variables
When CAPMOD = -2, the following output variables are available:
| Parameter | Description | Units |
| QG | Gate charge | C |
| QD | Drain charge | C |
| QS | Source charge | C |
| CGGS | Derivative of Qg over Viss | F |
| CGGD | Derivative of Qg over Vidd | F |
| CDGS | Derivative of Qd over Viss | F |
| CDGD | Derivative of Qd over Vidd | F |
| CSGS | Derivative of Qs over Viss | F |
| CSGD | Derivative of Qs over Vidd | F |
| GCGGS | Derivative with time of Cggs | F/s |
| GCGGD | Derivative with time of Cggd | F/s |
| GCDGS | Derivative with time of Cdgs | F/s |
| GCDGD | Derivative with time of Cdgd | F/s |
| GCSGS | Derivative with time of Csgs | F/s |
| GCSGD | Derivative with time of Csgd | F/s |
| CQG | Current due to gate charge | A |
| CQD | Current due to drain charge | A |
| CQS | Current due to source charge | A |
Demonstration of the Charge
Conserving Feature
A 5-stages ring-oscillator has been simulated with MOS16 model (level
36) with both Shur capacitance and Lerouxs charge models.
It has been observed that no differences are noticed in the output
voltage of the first stage (Figure 2). On the other hand, a evolution
of the corresponding gate charge in one among transistors of the
first stage can be observed on Figure 3. The gate charge is not
conserved with Shur model (CAPMOD=0).

Figure 2. Output of the first stage of
a ring oscillator.
Figure 3. Gate charge evolution of a transistor in a ring oscillator.
New Improvements Selector
Smart selector has been added to select different Silvaco improvements.
This selector is compatible with existing RPI flag selector as following:
- if RPI is given, Smart = 0,
- if RPI is not given, Smart is the model parameter
SMART (RPI has priority over SMART);
- if SMART = 0, this is equivalent to RPI
given,
- if SMART = 1, this is the Silvaco implementation
of the Shur model with some corrections (equivalent to RPI
not given in the previous version of SmartSpice);
- if SMART = 2, this is equivalent to SMART
= 1 with new limitations. The new limitations allows to reduce
up to a factor 2 the number of iterations during an OP analysis.
- By default, SMART = 2 (the default is the
last improvement)
- if SMART = 1, this is the Silvaco implementation
of the Shur model with some corrections (equivalent to RPI
not given in the previous version of SmartSpice);
References
- M. S. Shur and al., "Modeling and scaling
of a-Si:H and Poly-Si Thin Film Transistors", Material Research
Society Proceeding, Amorphous and Microcrystalline Silicon Technology,
467, 1997.
- G. A. Armstrong and al., "Modeling of Laser-Annealed
Polysilicon TFT Characteristics", IEEE Electron Device Letters,
vol. 18, No. 7, July 1997.
- "New parameters for TFT model: Amorphous
(level=35) and Polysilicon (level=36) TFT", Simulation Standard,
Volume 10, Number 1, January 1999, pp 9.